Health movement voices anger after Roundup warning ruling
NBC News reported that some in the Make America Healthy Again movement criticized a Supreme Court ruling involving Bayer’s Roundup weed killer.
By Tom Brennan · Health & Medicine Correspondent
2 min read
Some members of the Make America Healthy Again movement are criticizing a Supreme Court decision involving Roundup, the weed killer made by Bayer, NBC News reported. The ruling matters because the court said Bayer was not required to warn consumers about a possible cancer risk tied to the product, according to NBC News.
NBC News’ Julie Tsirkin reported on the reaction June 25, saying the decision drew frustration from parts of the MAHA movement. One member of the movement described the ruling as “sickening,” NBC News reported.
The case centered on whether Bayer, which manufactures Roundup, had to give consumers a warning about a potential cancer risk connected to the weed killer, according to NBC News. The Supreme Court ruled that the company did not need to provide that warning.
The Make America Healthy Again movement has focused public attention on health and consumer-safety issues, according to NBC News’ framing of the reaction. In this instance, some of its supporters objected to the court’s decision because it removed a warning requirement they wanted applied to Roundup.
NBC News did not report additional details in the segment about the vote count, the legal reasoning behind the ruling or Bayer’s response. The report focused on the reaction from people aligned with the MAHA movement after the Supreme Court’s decision.
The ruling leaves Bayer without the warning obligation described in the report. For critics in the health movement, NBC News reported, the outcome intensified concerns about how consumers are informed about possible risks linked to widely used products.
This story draws on original reporting from NBC News.